JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 10, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se reconoce como Perito Constitucional Voluntario, al profesor César Rodríguez Garavito.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. Reconocer como Perito Constitucional Voluntario al profesor Cesar Rodriguez Garavito, conforme lo indicado en el acapite considerativo de esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. Informar de esta determinacion a los demas Peritos Constitucionales Voluntarios, asi como a la Contraloria General de la Republica, a la Procuraduria General de la Nacion, a la Defensoria del Pueblo, al Ministerio de Salud y Proteccion Social, al Ministerio de Hacienda y Credito Publico, a la Superintendencia Nacional de Salud y al Administrador Fiduciario del Fosyga.
  3. Tercero. La Secretaria General de esta Corporacion librara las comunicaciones pertinentes, remitiendo copia de este proveido.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.